Tuesday 9 September 2014

Europe, the “tick-tock” of economic recovery...

Is Europe’s recovery a sustainable one?




We all know of Europe’s economic recession and the Euro chaos that hit periphery countries like Ireland, Greece and Portugal since 2008. The slide in living standards, sky-high unemployment and governments in constant disagreement could do more to allay our fears for a better future.

So, now looking at some recent metrics, domestic demand is expected to grow real GDP by 1.4% in 2014 and 1.7% in 2015, which of course is positive. May’s figures showed an unemployment rate ranging from Spain’s 25.1% down to Austria’s 4.7%. Unemployment in the Euro area was at 11.6% and the European Union as a whole was at 10.3%. The PMI composite index is at 52.8 in June, which is slightly down from May but continuing to signal expanding economic activity (50+ is expansion). Inflation is expected to remain stable around .5% to 1% for the foreseeable future. It’s also also noteworthy to think of all this and the size of the European Union, which is at 505 million people over 28 sovereign nations.

So, after an awful 7 or so years, we Europeans are on the road to recovery, but is it sustainable and will it succeed? In thinking about this question, one should consider the following points as material to the answer.

Debt Burden. The debt shouldered by sovereigns to support the banks and their blistering mistakes over time has left many countries in great crises with austere fiscal adjustments hitting their societies extremely hard. The OECD being the most optimistic predicts EU “Debt to real GDP” by 2020 will be at 160% with the EU Troika’s target of 134% heralded as untenable assuming current real GDP growth rates (c.1.5%) continue. Countries will struggle across the euro zone with debt as a result, especially those who are not competitively structured for inward investment in their economy. Currency devaluation once sovereign structural and policy upgrades are complete should be considered if there is still a “debt lag” in the economies of the sovereigns.



Investment. For Europe to recover sustainably, countries that are not competitively geared up for recovery, need to pursue policies of reform making commercial development of new and established business easier with more effective regulation replacing out-dated regularly practices. They also need to address key issues like overly bureaucratic processes in some areas, lack of regulation in others, corruption and plan for strategic growth areas such as exports and domestic consumption.

War. The rising threat posed by a seemingly deceptive Russia along with unstable Middle Eastern countries has raised the priority of defence spending in Europe once again and the need for defence investment. The requirements in Europe in partnership with NATO partners like the US raise numerous security concerns that will need funding and resources. The fiscal pressure given the debt burden of the region should be weighted against the projected fiscal cost associated with risks of increased asymmetrical attacks on EU soil, damage to reputation and business affecting investment and industry alike.

Energy. Europe’s scope for economic stagnation should not be overlooked when you think of how paralysing an energy crisis can be even in gas. Manufacturing is heavily dependant on energy and water to function and grow. Without it, the wheels of our European economic recovery will grind to a halt. Consideration to multiple vendors for gas should given noting Germany already has such arrangements in place.



Political Relations. Russia, China and the host of issues with sovereigns in the Middle East impact the trajectory curve of Europe’s recovery. The export market for Europe requires stability and for stability to be sustainable, the resolution of many geo political conflicts and issues is of utmost priority. Without it, the key export markets for the EU will be in vulnerable to destabilising world forces interrupting international trade via conflict and/or improper trade conduct.

US. The stalled free trade EU-US deal (TAFTA) is the highlight here, which has huge positive and negative potential for the EU.  The US is a key trading and security partner with Europe and cross Atlantic cooperation with the US should continue to secure lucrative deals such as “TAFTA”.  That said, sovereign rights should not be overlooked given the ambition of some lobbyists to have rights of dictation to nations on what laws are permissible and what are not. In essence, for a sustainable recovery in Europe, any deal must create a value spread to the regional societies and not extract value from said societies.




We have a long road to economic recovery in Europe but have made considerable progress with forward signs signalling the economic momentum is increasing within the Union. However, to be sustainable, we need to address our deficiencies, build on our efficiencies and remember the welfare of our children’s children when building a sustainable tomorrow today!


Sources/Credits:

Pics





Credits






No comments:

Post a Comment